Are the Right People Really in the Right Seats?
How the Accountability Chart, Scorecard, and Delegate & Elevate Reveal the Truth About Your Leadership Team
I was on a check-in call recently with a client I’ve been working with for some time — a sharp, growth-minded entrepreneur. He’s got the vision, the drive, and the hunger to scale. But somewhere in the middle of our conversation, he said something that stopped me:
“I keep pulling and pushing everybody in the direction they’re supposed to be going. I should be the dumbest one in the room.”
That hit me. Because I hear versions of that same statement from almost every Visionary I work with. And in almost every case, the issue isn’t the people in the seats — it’s that the people sitting in those seats don’t fully understand what’s actually expected of them.
“Uncommunicated Expectations Are Premeditated Resentments”
There’s a quote I come back to often in my work with leadership teams:
“Uncommunicated expectations are premeditated resentments.”
Think about that in the context of your leadership team. If you’ve never clearly written out the five core roles of each seat on your Accountability Chart — and if the person sitting in that seat has never had those roles explicitly communicated to them — then every gap in performance is, in a sense, one you helped create.
That’s not a blame statement. It’s a leadership reality. You cannot hold someone accountable to expectations they were never given. And yet, this is exactly what happens on most leadership teams I walk into. The Visionary has a mental model of what each seat should produce — but that model lives entirely in their head.
The Accountability Chart is your first step toward fixing that. Not just as an org chart — but as a living document that defines what each seat is truly responsible for. When you clearly articulate the five roles of every seat, something powerful happens: the person in that seat finally understands what roles they are responsible for.
The Accountability Chart: More Than Boxes and Lines
In my work with this client, we were talking about an operations manager who had been with the company for ten years. By every measure of loyalty and tenure, she should have been thriving. But my client kept circling back to a nagging feeling that she wasn’t executing in her role — especially as the company prepares for a major growth phase.
When I asked him what the five roles of that operations seat were, he paused. He couldn’t recall what she was actually accountable for.
Here’s what I told him — and what I tell every leadership team I work with:
- Start with the Accountability Chart. Every seat needs clearly defined roles — not vague responsibilities, but specific outcomes that seat is expected to own.
- Communicate those roles directly. Not implied. Not assumed. Explicitly stated and agreed upon.
- Confirm the person GWCs the seat — they Get it, Want it, and have the Capacity to Do it.
You can’t assess whether someone GWCs their seat if the seat itself isn’t clearly defined. That’s where so many leadership teams get stuck — frustration builds, performance is questioned, but no one goes back to the Accountability Chart and checks the roles.
One of the ways we determine if someone GWCs their seat is through the Scorecard.
The Scorecard Problem No One Is Talking About
Here’s one of the biggest gaps I consistently see on leadership teams: the Scorecard is built — but it doesn’t actually tell you whether each seat is executing.
What typically happens is the Visionary — or the founding team — builds a Scorecard loaded with financial metrics: cash flow, revenue, margins. Important numbers, for sure. But those are company-level outcomes, not seat-level indicators. They tell you what happened. They don’t tell you who is or isn’t running their lane.
Every leadership team seat should have at least one measurable on the Scorecard that tells the Integrator — at a glance — whether that seat is performing. Not fluffy numbers that get reported every week because they’re easy to track. Meaningful numbers that actually reflect whether the person in that seat is doing their job. And critically, those numbers should connect directly to the roles they’re accountable for in their seat.
My client put it perfectly: he’d ask his team to suggest scorecard metrics and get blank stares. That’s telling. A strong leader who genuinely gets their seat should have something top of mind — some metric, some indicator, some number they’re always watching because they know it moves the needle in their department.
If they can’t name one, that tells you something important about their GWC.
Here’s a practical exercise I encourage every team to do: sit down with each leadership team member and ask them, “What are two to three numbers that, if we tracked them weekly, would tell us whether you’re truly executing in your seat?” The answers — or the silence — will tell you everything you need to know.
Delegate & Elevate: Not Just for Delegation — It’s for Discovery
Most people think of Delegate & Elevate as a time management tool — a way for leaders to get things off their plate. And yes, it absolutely serves that purpose. But one of the most powerful uses of the Delegate & Elevate exercise is as a diagnostic tool to see whether someone truly loves — and is great at — the roles in their seat.
The exercise is simple: write out everything you do. Then categorize each task — Love it and great at it, Like it and good at it, Don’t love it but can do it, or Don’t like it and not great at it. The pattern that emerges is often startling.
In working with my client, I suggested having his operations manager fill out the Delegate & Elevate form before their upcoming Quarterly. Not as a punitive exercise — but as a genuine discovery conversation. What does she love to do? What energizes her? Where does she feel competent and confident?
Because here’s what I’ve seen happen time and time again: the person in a seat that isn’t working for them often knows it deep down. They may be holding onto a title because of what they believe it represents — status, pay, security. But when given a safe space to be honest, they often reveal that the actual work of that seat doesn’t light them up. This is where you really surface the “Want” in GWC.
I had a sales manager in another client’s company step down from her role voluntarily after completing this exercise. When she looked at her own list, her response was: “I hate managing people.” That was the clarity she needed. We found her a seat she loved — and the whole team got better.
The Delegate & Elevate tool doesn’t just help people get things off their plate. It helps people — and their leaders — see whether they’re actually in the right seat at all. Ask yourself: do the tasks in their “Love it / Great At” column line up with the roles in their seat?
Bringing It All Together: A People System, Not a People Problem
When I left my call with this client, I walked away with three clear action items for him — and they’re the same three I’d offer any leadership team dealing with people issues at this level:
- Clarify the Accountability Chart. Write out the five roles for every seat on the leadership team. Communicate them directly. Don’t let assumptions do the work that clarity should do.
- Fix the Scorecard. Make sure every seat has at least one weekly measurable that tells the Integrator whether that seat is running its lane — numbers tied directly to the roles of that seat, not just company-wide financials.
- Use Delegate & Elevate as a discovery tool. Have every leadership team member complete the exercise — not just to offload tasks, but to understand whether the work of their seat is the work they were born to do.
People issues at the leadership team level rarely come down to bad people. In my experience, they almost always come down to unclear systems — unclear roles, unclear expectations, and unclear measurables. When you tighten those up, something remarkable happens: the right people find their footing, and the wrong seats become obvious without drama.
Remember: uncommunicated expectations are premeditated resentments. If someone isn’t performing in their seat, before you ask whether they’re the right person, ask whether they were ever truly set up to succeed.